Наследие Рима. Том 1. Oт Византии дo Кордовского Халифата и Османскoй империи - Нурлан Аманович Наматов

and London, 1971; Vryonis, ‘A personal history of the history of the battle of Mantzikert’, E Vyzantine Mikra Asia, Athens, 1998, рр. 225–244; Vryonis, ‘The battles of Manzikert (1071) and Myriocephalum (1176). Notes on food, water, archery, ethnic identity of foe and ally’, in G. Leiser, ed., Mésogeios Méditerranée 25–26 (2005), рр. 49–69; Vryonis, ‘The Greek and the Arabic sources on the battle of Mantzikert (1071 A.D.)’, in Byzantine studies. Essays on the Slavic world and the eleventh century, ed. S. Vryonis, Jr, New Rochelle, 1992, 125–140; Vryonis, ‘The Greek and the Arabic sources on the eight-day captivity of the emperor Romanus IV in the camp of the sultan Alp Arslan after the battle of Mantzikert’, in Novum Milennium (sic). Studies on Byzantine history and culture dedicated to Paul Speck, eds C. Sode and S. Takacs, Aldershot, 2000, рр. 439–450. His new book on Manzikert is eagerly awaited.

259

Carole Hillenbrand Turkish Myth and Muslim Symbol: The Battle of Manzikert.

260

C. Cahen, ‘La première pénétration turque en Asie Mineure (seconde moitié du XIe siècle)’, Byzantion 18 (1948), 5–67.

261

Nizam al-Mulk, Siyar al-Muluk, tr. H. Darke as The Book of Government or Rules for Kings, London, 1978, 96.

262

J.-C. Cheynet, ‘Mantzikert: un désastre militaire?’, Byzantion, 50 (1980), 412.

263

Vryonis, Decline, 74, 76.

264

For the two earlier campaigns, cf. Ch. 2, n. 69.

265

Дед автора того же имени и «герцога всего запада».

266

J.-C. Cheynet, ‘La conception militaire de la frontière orientale (IXXIII siècle)’, in Eastern approaches to Byzantium, ed. A. Eastmond, Aldershot, 2000, 57.

267

Nicephorus Bryennius, 106.

268

Ibid., 488.

269

Ibn al-Adim, Zubdat al-halab min tarikh Halab, ed. S. Dahan, Damascus, 1954, ii, 11–13; cf. S. Zakkar, The emirate of Aleppo 1004–1094, Beirut, 1971, 173.

270

Zakkar, ibid., 176.

271

Ibid., 177.

272

There are a number of general accounts of varying length and quality, both academic and popular, about the battle of Manzikert. These include C. Oman, Ahistory of the art of war,London, 1898, 216–222; J. Laurent, Byzance et les Turcs seldjoucides dans l’Asie occidentale jusqu’en 1081, Nancy, 1913, 43–44; S. Runciman,A history of the Crusades, I, Cambridge, 1954, 62–65; S. Vryonis Jr, The decline of medieval l Hellenism in Asia Minor and the process of Islamization from the eleventh through the fifteenth century, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London, 1971, 96–104; A. Friendly, The dreadful day: the battle of Manzikert, 1071, London, 1981, 163–203; M.M. Qureshi, Landmarks of jihad, Lahore, 1971, 161–171; S. O’Shea, Sea of faith, London, 2006, 102–103, 118–125, 128. Cf. also S. Vryonis, Jr, ‘The Greek and the Arabic sources on the battle of Mantzikert(1071A.D.)’, in Byzantine studies. Essays on the Slavic world and the eleventh century, ed. S. Vryonis, Jr, NewRochelle, 1992, 125–140; Vryonis, ‘The Greek and the Arabic sources on the eight – day captivity of the emperor Romanus I Vin the camp of the sultan Alp Arslan after the battle of Mantzikert’, in Novum Milennium (sic). Studies on Byzantine history and culture dedicated to Paul Speck, eds C. Sode and S. Takacs, Aldershot, 2000, 439–450; C. Cahen. ‘The Turkish invasions: the Selchükids’, in AHistory of the Crusades, I, ed. M.W. Baldwin, general ed. K.M. Setton, Madison, Milwaukee and London, 1969, 148–149; P. Charanis, ‘The Byzantine empire in the eleventh century’, in Baldwin, AHistory of the Crusades, I, 192–193. Not surprisingly, in view of his prolonged interesting this subject, Vryonis’ scholarly works are the best researched and the most authoritative.

273

Cheynet, ‘Mantzikert’, 491.

274

This confusion has not been clarified in the secondary literature on the battle.

275

M. Hamidullah, ‘The map of the battle of Malazgird on basis (sic) of historical (sic) description of the battle’, Islamic Culture 19 (1945), 353; cf. also O’Shea, Sea of Faith, 123.

276

For full details, the reader is directed to the account of Attaleiates in Appendix A.

277

Cf. Ch. 3, p. 61.

278

Cf. Ch. 3, p. 76.

279

For a full treatment of this part of the narrative cf. S. Vryonis, Jr, ‘The Greek and the Arabic sources on the eight-day captivity’. Vryonis remarks that it is only on the subject of the emperor’s captivity that there is ‘a fundamental agreement and similiarity of contents in both the Greek and Arabic sources’; cf. Vryonis, ‘A personal history’, 233.

280

Ibid.

281

Friendly, 179.

282

Cf. Chapter 2, n. 53.

283

Cf. Chapter 5, pp. 121–3, for a discussion of the religious significance of Friday.

284

Vryonis, ‘A personal history’, 232.

285

Cheynet, ‘Mantzikert’, 410–438.

286

Ibid., 412

287

Ibid., 413.

288

Ibid., 416.

289

Ibid.

290

Ibid., 417.

291

Cheynet, 427, n. 94.

292

W.E. Kaegi Jr, ‘The contribution of archery to the Turkish conquest of Anatolia’, Speculum 39/1 (1964), 96–108. Уолтер Эмиль Каеги – историк и ученый византийской истории, профессор истории